eurealist.co.uk

non partisan comment on the European Union and Westminster politics

 

The Tsunami Disaster and Aid Questions

The Tsunami Disaster and Aid Questions

The tsunami disaster has created a massive outpouring of charitable giving, which considering the massive loss of life in some of the poorest countries in the world is an understandable reaction. What else do we ordinary folks, have to offer, and what other could we do, but to contribute in the only way possible, to try in a small way to help those affected, the British people have already donated over £45 million, I would suspect that most of this money has been donated to those charities/agencies which are already working flat out to do the very best they can, charities already on the ground, already delivering desperately needed first aid to the affected areas. To assist in this first aid the USA has arranged for ( Eureferendum) “A US Navy aircraft carrier battle group, based on the carrier USS Lincoln, is heading from Hong Kong to Sumatra. Five ships from the 17-strong group are to be deployed off Sumatra, the area worst hit by Sunday’s tsunami. Nine P3C Orion surveillance aircraft, including some based at Kadena Air Base on Okinawa, Japan, have also been deployed.

Six C130 transport aircraft based out of Japan are being diverted to Thailand to help in relief operations and the first of many C130s has landed in Indonesia. Flying out of Kadena, Japan, it touched down in the Sumatran city of Medan on Thursday with a load of relief supplies and body bags for the estimated 80,000 dead in this country alone.

The aircraft also brought an advance team of about a dozen troops who will assess the situation and determine the logistics needed for the US relief operation.

Along with the airport at Medan, a Thai navy air base used by US B-52 bombers during the Vietnam War is turning into a hub for the US military-led relief effort, which will also include humanitarian operations for Sri Lanka and India. By next week, 1,000 US military personnel will be based there, helping with relief operations.

The US Navy has also answered the call for help by deploying Expeditionary Strike Group 5, based in Guam. The three-ship force, comprising the amphibious assault ships, USS Bonhomme Richard, USS Duluth and USS Rushmore, initially scheduled for R&R, were immediately turned round and despatched to the disaster area.

With a combined crew roster of more than 6,000, this force not only has specialist medical capabilities, including surgical theatres, but also super-lift and medium-lift helicopters that can be used for a variety of missions to include search and rescue as well as transport of relief supplies.”

Yet there are voices of caution those who would question the soundness of the beauty contest over which of our countries is going to contribute the most to help relive the disaster, whilst the EU and the UN are arranging to hold donor conferences, to talk about the best way to help these devastated people,
there are questions about the second wave of assistance these areas are going to need and the whole concept of aid. We obviously need to do something because natural disasters happen everywhere in the world but it is only in the poorer countries that so much damage and loss of life occurs. Nothing could have stopped the tsunami once it had been triggered by the earthquake, and man has yet to find out if it is possible to even predict with any degree of certainty that an earth quake or volcano eruption is about to happen. But there are things that could be done to reduce the massive loss of life and the immense damage to infrastructure these events cause in the third world, because in the west we suffer to a certain extent the same events, yet the damage and loss of life is on a totally different scale.

Dr Eamonn Butler writing for the; The Adam Smith Institute“The devastation was overpowering, yes. But the human cost is all the heavier because most of the countries affected are poor. Homes and workplaces weakly built; poor roads and telecommunications that make it hard to summon help or deliver it with speed and accuracy to where it is needed; inadequate medical and emergency services; too little education that could save lives.
It was the same in the Caribbean hurricanes earlier this year. Poor Haiti suffered enormous damage, with many killed and half its GNP wiped out. For rich Florida, hit by the same storm, it is basically an insurance claim. Homes and public infrastructure in Florida are more solidly built, storm planning is efficient, mobile phones are everywhere.
The real lesson is that we have to make the world richer. Because richer people can stand up to natural disasters better than poorer ones. We need trade, markets, peace, democracy, low taxes — all the things that will deliver growth fast to the developing world. That is the way to save lives. Real lives that are being lost right now. Quite frankly, that will do more for the planet than the theoretical and far-off benefits of Kyoto”.

The Mises Institute
“This correlation between poverty and natural disaster seems to hold up not only with a cross-section of nations, but also over time. As nations become wealthier, their losses of human life from natural calamities tend to fall. The 1906 San Francisco earthquake (and the subsequent fire) killed at least 3,000 people out of a population of about 400,000. The 1994 quake in the same area killed only 60, out of a population that had almost doubled. Over 8,000 people in the Galveston, Texas area died in the hurricane of 1900, but hurricane Andrew’s 1992 path through a much more heavily populated Florida killed only 40 people.”

Perhaps the EU would do more long term good next week when it holds its donor conference, to think in terms that would eventually bring about an end to the effects of these events.

More
More
More

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On January 1, 2005
At 1:26 pm
Comments : 0
 
 

Reading the Runes

Thank you to Martin Cole at Ironies for the link to the Yorkshire post and more from our very own EU Propaganda Minister Denis xenophobe MacShane.

The Yorkshire Post feature
Reading the runes for 2005To celebrate the dawn of a new year, we asked a collection of writers to look into their crystal balls to offer a personal perspective on their hopes
for 2005

On BRITISH POLITICS

Anthony Seldon is author of Blair, the biography of the Prime Minister.
Sleson suggests that the Liberals will make a break through this year, as they are already the main opposition, one can hardly argue with that fact. As the Conservative shadow team, seem to have decided that opposition is simply a matter of agreeing with every policy Tony Blair proposes, and then arguing about the finer points. But according to Sheldon, Howard will be safe if he can manage to gain a further 50 seats for the Tories, gone are the days when they were prepared to offer the voters a choice on principal, or that they even thought they could run the country. They do now appear to be quite happy to stand on the sidelines and carp about little things as the Blair government destroys everything we have been led to believe made Britain Great, as they steamroller in the new EU code Napoleon which will forever remove the sovereignty of the British people and give British politics the same status as our local councils now enjoy.

On European POLITICS

Denis MacShane is Minister for Europe and MP for Rotherham.

MacShane suggest that this year will decides if “Britain leads Europe or those wanting to isolate Britain gain support.” Well its nice to be offered a choice, but first can the Minister for propaganda explain exactly how Britain intends to lead Europe, from its position as a mere state in the EU, when the EU itself will gain the legal authorisation of a state, taking its powers directly from the people over the heads of the national parliaments from its own constitution, which is superior to our constitution with its own law which is superior to our law.

MacShane suggests that Britain has always been a confident leader in the G8 and the UN but us nasty anti-Europeans say we should keep Europe at arm’s length. Now Dr you really must listen, we Eusceptics have nothing against Europe it is the illegal undemocratic British government in Brussels you are trying to force on the British people which we reject. Neither the UN nor the G8 have any intention to ever remove the sovereignty of the British people to elect and remove those who make our laws. So lead away we do not mind, but please do stop giving away those powers we the British people have loaned our Parliament to run our country for us to an unaccountable and unelected soviets style politburo in the EU.

And Dr MacShane the new EU constitutional treaty really does not transfer any powers from Brussels to national governments and national parliaments perhaps as this is your job you should actually read what is in the document you could then see for yourself that what you are telling the British people is an outright lie. You would also see that far from being isolationists Eusceptics are the only ones promoting the autonomy of that organisation you swore to defend.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 11:20 am
Comments : 0
 
 
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 202 access attempts in the last 7 days.