eurealist.co.uk

Martin Cole at Ironies has a link to Free Nations

It was reported in early December by EU Observer that there will be no referendum in Sweden on the new EU Constitution. Of course to be more precise we should say “a new Swedish Constitution” (and of course a new German, British, French etc Constitution as well because all those democratic constitutions will also disappear).
The words of the relevant Article (I-10) are groundbreaking because of the first two words:
“The Constitution and law adopted by the Union’s Institutions in exercising competences conferred on it shall have primacy over the law of the Member States“.

There may be one or two gullible and naive people in the world who believe Blair and Straw when they say “it is a constitution like that of a golf club”. But we all know - and we know that the arch eurofederalists know - that any International Court and certainly the all-powerful and highly politicised “European Court” will interpret the word Constitution to mean just that.

It is impossible to live under two Constitutions with their separate Courts. One MUST BE superior to the other and sure enough what we have here is the superiority of the EU - with its Constitution, Constitutional Court, embryo Euro Army, Executive, Legislature, passport etc etc.

So the Swedes are about to abolish Sweden - but the Swedish people will not be able to vote on the matter! There has been a stitch up of the kind we have observed all over Europe between the four right-wing opposition parties in the Swedish Parliament and the Social Democrat Prime Minister Göran Persson. As in Britain these arrogant little nonentities believe that sovereignty rests with Parliament and that because they control Parliament (today) the people should do as they are told (for ever or irrevocably and irreversibly as the EU Treaties say). This is the Mitterand, Chirac, Kohl and Schroeder School of Democracy.

(Blair has only agreed to a referendum in Britain as an electoral ploy against the Conservative Opposition.)
I actually disagree with this, I believe that Blair had no intention of allowing a referendum but it was pointed out to him, possible by the Palace that to install a new Constitution for Britain without one was illegal the Bill of rights says that any law which attempts to overturn it is illegal, thus leaving the whole constitution open to a later challenge in the courts however if he can win the referendum any such challenge would be undermined.

Break

The Swedes rejected the Euro in a referendum in September 2003 against all odds and against the recommendation of the political establishment. So the political Establishment cannot risk another exercise in Democracy - no more than can the EU, which is why the whole fascist edifice was constructed long before any votes were possible.