eurealist.co.uk

EU Referendum

One of the central political issues confronting the United Kingdom at this time is our relationship with “Europe” – more specifically the European Union – the enthusiasm for which is to be tested in due course in the referendum on the EU constitution.

Given the degree of foreign policy and defence integration involved in that constitution, closer European political integration will inevitably been a more distant relationship with the United States – even the end of the “special relationship”, which has been the subject of several postings on this Blog.

How we perceive the United States viz-à-viz the European Union, therefore, is an issue of profound political significance in which context it would make absolute sense for those in favour of greater political integration with the EU to project “Europe” in a favourable light and to denigrate the United States.

Whether that is the specific intention of the Europhile media – and especially the BBC - is open to question, but it is definitely the effect of their coverage of a whole range of issues, not least the Iraqi war where sentiment has been almost uniformly hostile to the United States.

But even in the coverage of the Asian tsunami crisis, this anti-US bias has been continued and, in the BBC, is becoming so transparent as to be alarming for what is supposed to be a public service broadcaster dedicated to impartial coverage of the news. It cannot be accidental. There must be a hidden agenda. MORE…
EU Referendum

With reference to the previous posting, I have just reconfirmed that the EU Commision is made up from one member from each state, however not one of these is from an ethnic minority.

EUREALIST has therefore decided that the Commision has three years to address this disgusting evidence of racial bias, as evidenced by the very fact that there are no persons from any ethnic minorities who are members. The mix for disabled persons must also be adjusted and the mix for sexes is far to biased in favour of males, with only seven out of the twenty five being female it is unacceptable for 50% of EU citizens to be under represented on the EU`s own Commision in this way.

There are seven ex communists which considering the refusal of the only Catholic is the wrong mix and indicates a clear bias against this religious group. Therefore it is imperative that the religious mix be adjusted to clearly represent the major religions of the EU. Eurealist feels that, as there are two Commissioner members who have been found guilty of fraud, one who has been sacked twice for misconduct and one who will financially benefit directly from her decisions that the mix of the dubious category is about right for this type of organisation.

But, serious efforts should be made to redress the balance between right handed Commissioners and left handed ones, unless of course it can be shown that those on the left even though right handed, could qualify as being left, in which case there would probably be to many on the left, if added to the already seven Ex Communists. Except they are also left handed, in which case they would be designated double left, this of course would unbalance the whole Commision and needs to be even-handed by more commissioners on the right or perhaps disabled one handed commissioners could be used instead.

Eurealist also finds that there is much evidence of age discrimination as evidenced by the fact that there are no commissioners under the age of twenty five, in fact by far the greater number of commissioners are over forty five, this is clear evidence of ageism at work in the EU generally. This position is totally unacceptable and must be addressed as soon as possible, it is unforgivable and there can be no excuse for such blatant discrimination.

Lakeland walkers ‘wrong colour’

By John Crowley (Filed: 03/01/2005)

In a letter informing volunteers of the authority’s decision, Paul Tiplady, national park officer, said more regional and EU funding would be attracted by refocusing on the “urban young, people from ethnic communities and disabled people”.

I do not understand the mentality behind this confirmation of political correctness gone mad, there is absolutely nothing preventing anybody of any ethnicity visiting the countryside if they choose.

The EU however feels that they have a right to demand that the countryside changes in order to meet arbitary targets on the mix of minorities or they will withhold our money from our countryside organisations.

If the three year plan to attract more ethnic minorities, inner-city children and the disabled to the area fails to meet the arbitrary targets, what are they going to do next, force people onto busses and drag them out in the park, or perhaps ban middle aged middle class white people.

These moves were indicated in the middle of last year when certain groups suddenly began claiming that the countryside was racially biased, because not enough minorities visited. This is not only ridiculous but insulting, and shows a certain mindset that claims the evidence that because the mixes of those visiting the countryside do not conform to the ethnic mix in the country as a whole, is itself evidence of racism, they make this claim without any other verification to back up their accusations.

We are also witnessing the creeping power of the EU into the very fabric of our society the Lake District has been there as a part of unspoiled Britain for the pleasure of those who like what it has to offer ever since we began to take holidays, around that has grown the authority of the parks management to protect the environment and assist those who choose to visit, but this is not good enough for the EU who demand that the whole thing be politicised so to conform to their own agenda.

That is what happens when you allow the EU to reach into a country beyond our elected parliament and force their will on the people.