eurealist.co.uk

non partisan comment on the European Union and Westminster politics

 

The Elite Liars

EUobserver.com: “Hamburg court rules against Tillack
02.02.2005 - 09:58 CET | By Lisbeth Kirk

Hamburg’s highest court, the Oberlandesgericht, yesterday (1 February) ruled against former Brussels editor Hans-Martin Tillack and his employer, the German Stern Magazine, fighting a case against the EU anti-fraud office, OLAF.

The court said that, due to a general immunity protecting EU officials, it could not order a former European Commission spokesman not to spread allegations that Mr Tillack bribed EU officials.

The judge underlined that this does not mean that the Commission spokesman was telling the truth.

In 2002, Mr Tillack published articles in Stern about alleged irregularities in OLAF based on internal documents from the organisation.

OLAF then released a press statement saying it was possible that someone had been bribed to get the documents, an allegation that Stern magazine denied.

The bribery allegations were sourced to spokesman Joachim Gross in the cabinet of former Commissioner Michaele Schreyer. No proof was provided of any bribery.

In September, the lower Court, the Landgericht Hamburg, banned Mr Gross from repeating the allegations of bribery.

But Mr Gross - supported by the Commission and represented by lawyer Boris Uphoff - appealed against this decision, prompting the high court’s decision yesterday.

Mr Uphoff told the EUobserver that he considered the outcome of the case ‘obvious’.

‘Neither German courts nor any other national courts have jurisdiction over EU employees’, he added.

A protocol to the EU treaties from 8 April 1965 grants EU civil servants a life-long immunity from legal proceedings ‘in respect of acts performed by them in their official capacity, including their words spoken or written’.”

We sorted this in 1689 when we made everybody subject to the law another reason to vote NO

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On February 2, 2005
At 12:54 pm
Comments : 0
 
 

Not our fault Guv

ThisisLondon: ”

EC refuses to pick up ‘foot and mouth’ tab

By Isabel Oakeshott Political Correspondent, Evening Standard
2 February 2005

Taxpayers are facing a huge bill for the foot-and-mouth crisis because of government blunders.

Ministers have failed to convince agriculture chiefs in Brussels that the huge compensation pay-outs were justified. The European Commission has agreed to pay only £350 million of the £950 million Defra hoped to recoup.

A new report by the government spending watchdog, the National Audit Office, reveals that officials at the Ministry of Agriculture - now known as the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) - authorised huge payments to farmers without verifying the claims.

In one case, a farmer who paid an average of £60 each for six rams in October 2000 was paid £535 for each animal the following March. In another case, a farmer who paid £14,000 for a bullock in January 2001 received £40,000 when it was slaughtered four months later.

There are also fears that Defra has failed to make contingency plans for another outbreak following the 2001 epidemic. A total of 6.5million animals were slaughtered, devastating many farms and rural businesses”

Now there was me thinking that this was a competence of the EU and that was the reason we could not get moving quickly to stop the disease spreading, because we had to ask our masters in Brussels what we could do.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 12:43 pm
Comments : 0
 
 

In the News

What they will do to force this constitution on the people never ceases to amaze me, after more than thirty years of political machinations over the union it shouldn’t but it still does. We are told that this is a free referendum a democratic choice but the government is going to use every trick it can to get us to vote for the blessed thing.

Slovenia has become the third country to ratify the EU Constitution. Its parliament yesterday ratified it by a majority of 69 to 4. 7 MPs abstained; they did not bother to ask their citizens.

The French are in the middle of rewriting their Constitution to allow for the EU Constitution. And Le Monde reports that French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier has requested a thorough review of the Bolkestein Directive on the liberalisation of services, because of growing concerns about it in France and his anxiety that this may impact on the result of the referendum on the EU Constitution. In an interview with Le Figaro, French Foreign Minister Claudie Haigneré says the directive as it stands is “unacceptable.”
Also Le Figaro says that supporters of the EU Constitution in France are beginning to worry because of a growing risk that the ‘no’ side will win in the referendum in June. It says the reasons to oppose the Constitution abound. It cites concerns among the French about the ‘liberal’ way in which Europe is developing, and a perception that this is because of the Constitution, the reform of the 35-hour week, confusion about the entry of Turkey to the EU, and a general possibility that people will use the referendum as a plebiscite against Jacques Chirac. Vice-President of the ruling UMP party Jean-Claude Gaudin believes Catholic voters are among those who will potentially vote ‘no’, because of the French ‘laïcité’ law, the absence of a reference to Christian values in the preamble of the EU Constitution, and the Turkish question. Why Catholic voters should wish to vote for any institution which deems the basics of their religion to be unacceptable I do not know.

The Polish government has pushed back an early election over fears that the centre-right eurosceptic opposition could block the Constitution if elected. Opinion polls currently give the centre-right opposition a clear lead. President of the ruling SLD party Jozef Oleksy said “the elections should be held at the end of the legal mandate to prevent the right, which is opposed to the European constitution, rejecting the Treaty”. The party had previously promised to hold the election in June this year but it is now more likely to come in autumn. Poland is now expected to hold a referendum on the Constitution at the same time as the election, which the SLD party said would guarantee the 50 percent turnout required for a referendum to be valid

And in Britain The Daily Express and the Telegraph report that the Government has been accused of attempting to rig the referendum on the EU Constitution by holding it after every other country has voted ‘yes’. A “Whitehall official” is quoted saying that, “We will not hold the referendum until every other EU state has given its verdict and hopefully that is a resounding ‘yes’… That way we will be able to present a ‘yes’ vote as the obvious step for moderate centre-ground opinion and say that a ‘no’ vote would leave us completely isolated… It has been decided we cannot campaign on an overtly pro-European platform until after the election, so we need the longest possible time to win over moderate opinion. It will be like turning around an oil tanker.”

Talking of Campaigning Lord Kinnock or what ever he is called these days is going to be campaigning for the Britain in Europe Brigade. We are reminded today by Quentin Letts who writes in the Mail that while Neil Kinnock was in charge of combating fraud at the Commission the problem actually doubled and that the Kinnock family receives up to £500,000 a year from the EU.
Of course in no way would this sort of money influence anything he may have to say on the subject.

Other moves on the looking after are own pocket front,

The Luxembourg presidency of the EU is pushing for a reform of how MEPs are paid. A senior MEP said that a compromise currently on the table would see all MEPs paid around the same amount as German MEPs. The way travel expenses are allocated is also under review.
As each of these so called representatives cost us a cool million each year at present, it is good to know that they will not be suffering too badly on our behalf.

Whilst Peter Mandelson is complaining that those who place the great demands on the poor Commission also have the responsibility to willing the means.” And has caused his first dispute with the Blair Government since becoming a Commissioner by backing plans to increase the Commission budget. He said, “It is very important for the Commission to know where it is going. I could make a suggestion or two!

On the other side of the fence, that is those who are not earning such huge sums from the public purse;

The Guardian reports that the decision by Nissan to begin producing another model at its Sunderland plant is another blow to those who believe that it is in Britain’s interests to join the euro.

Kilroy launches new party: Veritas.

The German government is set to announce today that unemployment in the country has risen above 5 million for the first time since reunification in 1990.

But help is in the way!

Jose Barroso will announce a package of reforms today which will focus on increasing employment across the EU. But the Times reports that it will miss its target of getting 67 percent of adults working by 2005 and that the Commission’s Joint Employment Report says, “employment remains Europe’s Achilles heel”. The FT reports that Barroso is to focus on economic reform and has confirmed that the commitment to become the world’s most competitive economy by 2010 has been dropped. He said, “we should avoid slogans that put at risk the credibility of the whole exercise.” Commenting on what would happen if Britain votes ‘no’, “It will be a very difficult political problem if one or more member states don’t ratify… I believe the EU is much stronger because of Britain, and Britain is stronger for being in the EU. If political leaders in Britain explain to the public what Britain means to Europe and what Europe means to Britain, I believe the case for a ‘Yes’ vote is very, very clear.”

IF! they did that would really be a surprise, what they will do instead it to try to frighten us into voting their way.
They have not time to make us love the EU so fear is their only weapon.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 12:40 pm
Comments :1
 
 

British Diplomats make way for EU

Telegraph | News | Diplomats axed by Whitehall cost-cutters: “Britain’s ambassadors and senior diplomats around the world will be decimated in the coming months as the Foreign Office tries to find money for urgent tasks such as fighting terrorism and weapons proliferation.

Plus.net

A Foreign Office official confirmed that between 60 to 70 members of the ’senior management structure’ have agreed to retire early.

They make up about one in seven of Britain’s veteran diplomats, ranging from ambassadors to heads of departments in London. A further 200 people in more junior ranks have also taken voluntary redundancy packages.

The aim is to cut back the number of diplomats on higher salaries and to make room for talented younger officials on fast-track promotion.”

Odd this, I would have thought the aim was to clear the decks for the EU diplomatic corps. We obviously don’t need to duplicate the work they will be doing on our behalf, and as a mere state in USE we do not need a diplomatic corps of our own, does Maryland have a diplomatic corps?

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 8:13 am
Comments : 0
 
 

Gone Native

News: “Peter Mandelson, the EU trade commissioner, is involved in his first dispute with the Government since taking up his post after backing calls for a multibillion-euro boost to the EU budget.

Mr Mandelson has defied British demands for a freeze on EU spending by supporting plans by his new boss, Jose Manuel Barroso, the European Commission president, to expand its budget.

His stance puts him on collision course with Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, and Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary - all of whom want a ceiling on future EU spending to be set at 1 per cent of gross national income for 2007-13.

Mr Mandelson said: ‘It is very important for the Commission to know where it is going. Great demands are placed on us. Those who place the demands also have the responsibility to willing the means.

‘If they want that combination of reform which means [economic] adjustment, they also have to will the support and assistance for that adjustment through reasonable social spending, structural fund spending, regional policy and rural development policy.’”

What do they expect as a British Minister Mandelson swore allegiance to the crown, now as an EU commissioner he has broken that oath and sworn allegiance to the EU. When he has finished his time in Brussels he will be placed in the House of Lords, where he will again swear allegiance to the Crown but will have a pension from the EU which is dependant on not going against that organisation, proving once again that to these people oaths mean nothing.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 7:59 am
Comments : 0
 
 

Australian PM’s accusation of EU anti-Americanism

Channelnewsasia.com: “PARIS : An accusation by Australian Prime Minister John Howard that France was guilty of lingering ‘anti-Americanism’ drew sharp words from Paris during a visit by the Australian foreign minister.

French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier, standing next to his Australian counterpart Alexander Downer, told journalists he was ‘very, very surprised’ to hear Howard’s remarks at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on the weekend.

He stressed that France and the United States were allies and would remain so, despite differences over the invasion of Iraq that have chilled transatlantic relations for the past two and a half years.

‘Anti-Americanism, when it exists, is no more productive than French-bashing,’ Barnier said, in apparent reference to persistent anti-French remarks by some US media and politicians, particularly over Iraq.

The Australian leader — a strong US ally — on Sunday accused ‘old Europe’ of unleashing ‘unfair and irrational’ criticism on the United States during a panel debate at the forum.

‘America has made mistakes,’ Howard told the panel, but later added in comments to The Australian newspaper that he believed there was an ‘irrational level of anti-Americanism’ in Europe.

‘It is a sign of parochialism and it is disturbingly intense,’ he said, singling out France and Germany as the worst offenders.

‘I found the French and German attitude has lingered longer than I thought it might, and longer than it is in anyone’s interests,’ Howard said.

Downer, who called French-Australian relations ‘very significant’, tried to play down Howard’s comments, saying they were made in the context of the Davos debate.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 7:50 am
Comments : 0
 
 

So Who Rules Britian ?

News: “Wanted by Brussels: A UK Productivity Tsar
By Stephen Castle in Brussels

02 February 2005

Britain will gain a new competitiveness and productivity ‘tsar’ to help boost growth and job creation, under plans to be published today to revitalise the European economy.

The post would be drawn from the ranks of government ministers and help sell the ‘Lisbon process’ of EU-wide economic reform, which will be relaunched today by the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso.

Like all 25 EU countries, the UK would set up a ‘National Action Programme for Jobs and Growth’, adopted after discussions in Parliament and with employers and unions. Mr Barroso believes the creation of ‘a Mr or Mrs Lisbon at government level charged with co-ordinating the different elements of the strategy’ is needed to push through promised reforms.”

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 7:46 am
Comments : 0
 
 

EU spreads its wings

ET Net News: “New European Union environmental requirements will affect about US$25 billion worth of Hong Kong exports annually and force manufacturers to invest heavily in compliance, according to industry groups. The waste electrical and electronic equipment directive, which comes into effect in Aug, will hold European retailers and their Hong Kong suppliers responsible for recycling what they sell in Europe. Consumer-goods retailers, for example, will have to accept discarded goods and pass them back to their suppliers for recycling or proper disposal, obliging exporters to restructure their supply chains and manufacturing processes. ‘Hong Kong manufacturers will have to invest a lot of effort to meet these requirements in a very short time,’ said Sunny Chai of the Hong Kong Electrical Appliances Manufacturers Association. Chai estimates that less than 10% of Hong Kong manufacturers realise how seriously the new EU directives could affect their businesses.”

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 7:42 am
Comments : 0
 
 

France protects national champion

France riles EU regulator

BRUSSELS The European Commission threatened on Tuesday to take France to court to demand the return of subsidies for the troubled engineering giant Alstom, alleging that Paris had failed to respect conditions for the company’s bailout.
.
“None of the list of measures which were supposed to be taken have been taken,” a commission spokesman, Jonathan Todd, said at a press briefing in Brussels. “Therefore the aid has been paid out illegally.”
.
France led a €4.4 billion, or $5.7 billion, rescue of Alstom, based near Paris, after the maker of trains and power stations was threatened with bankruptcy, jeopardizing 20,000 French jobs. In return, Paris agreed to open its markets by changing laws on government procurement and train-safety certificates that favored Alstom.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 7:40 am
Comments : 0
 
 

Another reason to vote No

Irish News - Irish Independent Online - Sunday Independent , Irish newspapers, News Ireland:

“The EU’s ‘big three’ last night launched a co-ordinated attack on new plans by the European Commission to block State aid to attract inward investment on their territories.

Last week, the Competition Commissioner, Neelie Kroes, announced her intention to block State aid to all the wealthier EU member states, except where it involved innovation or targeted small firms specifically.

Commission officials confirmed that this would also cover some of the grant aid offered by the IDA to attract multinationals to establish in Ireland. However, the backlash has come much quicker than expected, particularly since the Commission must still flesh out the detailed terms of its plans. Nevertheless, in a joint reaction, the governments of Britain, France and Germany last night rebuffed the Commissioner’s plans, arguing it would be extremely damaging for their own less wealthy regions.”

This may seem like good news Britain France and Germany in a combined action, however if we ratify the Constitution, this situation will be repeated time and again. But not necessarily with Britain involved, the system of weighted votes will mean that France and Germany with one or two other large states can dictate the outcome of any or all disputes, and literally force their will on the others.

This will not always work to our benefit but it will always work to the benefit of France and Germany.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 12:46 am
Comments : 0
 
 
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 239 access attempts in the last 7 days.