eurealist.co.uk

non partisan comment on the European Union and Westminster politics

 

Bridging the gap

Chirac calls for new summit to “reconcile” EU with voters. Jacques Chirac has called for a new summit, possibly during the UK presidency, to discuss how to “reconcile” the EU with voters. He said in a speech to EU leaders, “France is ready to back the idea of a special meeting of heads of government to address those crucial issues on which the future of the Union, and each of our countries, depends”. He argued that there was a need to “launch a discussion on how to reconcile citizens with the European project and to bridge the gap that threatens to open between Europe and its peoples”.

Funny that, I though this had already been done, wasn’t it at some place called Laeken and didn’t they set up a convention of the future of Europe, and didn’t Giscard s little central controllers ignore the Laeken declaration and go full steam ahead for more integration and more power to the EU institutions, and wasn’t that idea rejected by France and Holland, which led to this problem in the first place. Talk about not listening.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On June 17, 2005
At 9:28 am
Comments : 0
 
 

The Over Powerful

David Blunkett, in his days as Home Secretary, sneaked a clause into his Serious Organised Crime and Police Act, which comes into full force on August 1. The new law gives ministers the power to draw up an exclusion zone, anywhere within a kilometre of Parliament Square, in which demonstrators are to be banned from protesting without permission from the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police.
This week, Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, exercised to the full his new power to set an exclusion zone around the Commons. He has banned all spontaneous demonstrations within half a mile of the Palace of Westminster.

The Telegraph

The right to demonstrate peacefully, without the permission of the Government or its agents, is an absolutely fundamental part of our democracy. Elections and opinion polls may measure the numbers of people who support a particular party or policy. But only demonstrations and protest marches can show the strength with which people hold their convictions.

It is one thing to stroll round the corner on election day and put a cross on a ballot paper. We can all do that, whether or not we care very strongly which candidate should win. But to join a protest march on Parliament requires vastly more time and commitment, and shows a strength of feeling that no ballot can.

The actual numbers of people who supported the Countryside Alliance in its campaign to stop the ban on foxhunting were not all that enormous, as a proportion of the electorate. But the fact that so many of them were prepared to go to the trouble of organising coach trips to Westminster from Aberdeen and Penzance, and marching all the way to London from Wales and Yorkshire, showed the sheer passion with which they held their views.

All right, the campaign failed. But there were many MPs representing urban constituencies who simply didn’t realise how strongly people felt, before the marchers arrived in Parliament Square. At least the marchers made them think - and that can only be good for an MP.

Politicians are insulated quite enough, as it is, from the people whom they represent. They are insulated by their index-linked pensions, their generous expenses and secretarial allowances, by the concrete tank-traps outside the Commons and the cheap beer inside. This new Act, with its powers to restrict the numbers and noise of demonstrators, can only cut them off further.

I wonder what the young, idealistic Tony Blair would have thought if somebody had told him in his student days, as he strummed his guitar and campaigned against apartheid and the Bomb, that one day he would restrict the freedom of British subjects to demonstrate. What would he have thought, come to that, if he had been told that he would introduce house arrest, restrict the right to trial by jury and try to force all British subjects to carry identity cards.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 7:31 am
Comments : 0
 
 

The over zealous

After all the big news about the EU Constitution and the British Rebate it is perhaps time to return, even if briefly to the real objections many ordinary people have against the EU and the absurd over-regulation imposed on them by central government.
As Government officials, acting on European regulations create new rules in an amendment to the Food Safety Act.

Now according to the Telegraph
All home bakers who sell their products at fetes, village cricket matches or WI stalls or farmers markets will have to record and keep and the receipts and account for every ingredient and these records must be available for inspection by Trading Standard’s who are insisting on them keeping receipts for a year for each item purchased.

A spokesman for the Food Standards Agency said the legislation only applies to outlets selling on a regular basis. He said: “We would envisage local authorities [will] take a proportionate and flexible approach.”

The European Commission Representation in the United Kingdom
On its Myth page labels this myth 137

Myth: Home-made cakes must be labelled with all ingredients

Crumbs, now home-made cake is dangerous – An EU directive may force full ingredients lists on all food retailers
The Times, 9 July 2004, page 5
If baking for the school or church fête was not onerous enough, the Government could soon ban home-made cakes from sale unless they carry a special label declaring whether they contain nuts.

Fact
New EU rules will require pre-packaged food sold in, for example, supermarkets, to be properly labelled with full ingredients lists. This will enable those who suffer from allergies to avoid the often very unpleasant consequences that can ensue after eating the wrong thing. However, Directive 2003/89/EC does not force full ingredients lists on food sold in places like restaurants and fast-food vans. Food sold loose or packaged on the premises for direct sale may be exempted from these strict labelling requirements, provided the consumer or customer receives “sufficient information”. How this is done is left up to individual member states, providing legislative leeway to avoid the type of over-regulation The Times suggests will affect home-made cakes sold at school fêtes.

It is all very well for the EU to claim that this is a myth and it is up to individual member states, but it is their directive which is being implemented. They may wish to claim that the British government is being over zealous in applying this directive, but the fact remains that is what is happening, and it does bring the affects of Brussels rule strait into the homes of every householder in Britain.

So is it any wonder that we then turn round and say we do not want these intrusive rules, we do not want to live in such an over regulated country we do not want to be forced to accept the laws of a government we cannot control. A curse on the EU and all the little small minded government officials who over egg the powers this organisation gives them to make our lives ever more proscribed.

Filed under : The Best of the Rest
By Ken
On
At 7:06 am
Comments : 0
 
 
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 239 access attempts in the last 7 days.