Unilateral withdrawal from the EU! How Else?
On his blog John Redwood wrote that the Conservatives failed yesterday in the House of Commons to get a commitment to a referendum on part of the Constitution, if they decide to smuggle some of it in by the back door. Mr Redwood says it is typical of this government’s approach. It is also typical of the Conservative approach to miss the fact that they are already smuggling parts of the constitution in through the back door.
However he correctly says “most people in the
But then in a veiled criticism of UKIP says “Some now think the only answer is to declare unilateral withdrawal from the EU” Mr Redwood argues that there are “two big problems with this approach”
“The first is there are no MPs elected to vote for this in the present Parliament, and no-one thinks there will be any elected on such a ticket for a fringe party after the next election either.”
“Secondly, we would need a series of agreements with the EU and other European countries which would need to be negotiated when changing the relationship. For example, we need agreement for landing rights at continental airports, train route agreements through the Tunnel, general trading agreements, environmental agreements over cross border pollution, agreements over the use of the
“The issue therefore is a simple one. If you like me belong to the Eurosceptic majority that wants a different relationship with the neighbours, is it best to negotiate without unilateral withdrawal, or try to negotiate after you have pulled out?
It seems obvious that you should negotiate. The best approach is for the
The first point he makes is rather like saying we do not want to breath because no party is offering us air and begs the question; if returning power to our government it is so important to Conservatives why on earth is it not their policy, the question the Conservative party needs to address is if it is not their policy as “most people in the UK strongly oppose a federal EU state” then why is it not their policy. The question we as voters need to consider is if the Conservative party will not offer sensible grown up policies on the EU then why should we bother to vote for them.
On the second point I think Mr Redwood is attempting to put the horse before the cart, first we should hold a referendum on staying in or leaving the EU. In this the Conservative party could and should lead the way in selling an alternative to EU membership for this country, then our government would negotiate the various agreements with the EU.
Mr Redwood then returns to the main theme of his post which boils down to an appeal for EUsceptics to back the Conservative parties approach to the EU.
“In the last three General Elections Eurosceptics have split their votes, giving the federalists an even bigger majority. It is ridiculous that a country which opposes the Euro, common borders, a common foreign and security policy and the constitution by big margins should be represented by a Lab Lib majority who want all these things.”
I am not persuaded by the argument that to vote for a party which stands on the platform of leaving the EU is splitting the EUsceptic vote, the Conservatives do not offer us that option, for as long as we remain a member, our own parliament in Westminster is a charade, and it really does not matter which particular British political party has to follow the socialist EU line.
What we can however glean from Mr Redwoods post is the Conservatives parliamentary party’s slow realisation that they just might need the EUsceptic vote their leader has so far distained. But I am afraid they will have to do a great deal better before they are ready to lead this country out of the EU madness which they took us into in the first place.
Technorati Tags: better-of-out, the-eu, tory-party, uk-government, ukip





























May I suggest that you sign the Better Off Out petition if you’re so inclined?
The UK-EU relationship must be renegotiated, at a minimum.
This is a bit off-topic request to Eurealist. In the article <a href="http://eurealitshome.com/blog/?p=671">Jean Monnet that elusive Quote</a>, you analysed a Jean Monnet quote common in Eurosceptic circles as erroneous, a misquote from someone talking about Monnet. But you also bring up another quote:<blockquote>3 April 1952 Monnet did say
“The fusion (of economic functions) would compel nations to fuse their sovereignty into that of a single European State.</blockquote>
This quote happens to be one I have been hunting in vain. The only appearances in English are on Eurosceptic pages, without text context or more on circumstances than the date, and I could find absolutely nothing in French. I have a strong suspicion that this is another misquote, from someone paraphrasing Monnet’s 30 April 1952 speech before the US National Press Club (which you also quote). Do you have a better source for the quote?